Fantastic entry about titling your work.
Jul. 4th, 2007 11:32 pmAs some of you might know, I have an English major. One of the most formative classes I took was a Shakespeare class. The woman teaching the class continually took off points for having boring titles for papers.
I'd always had boring titles. I always felt like it was kind of...showing off, maybe? to have fabulous titles. I mean, what if it doesn't live up to a cool title? But this teacher really pushed me, so I started naming my papers wildly, and she gave me full points.
I've kind of gotten out of that, but J really made me think about it. The title for Retribution was pretty boring, but at the last moment I froze, and went back into that old don't-make-the-expectations-too-high mode. Now that I read her entry, I realize that I'm not doing myself any favors by naming things so vaguely.
*resolves to name wildly in the future*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 11:41 am (UTC)In the case of prose, I usually have the title last; for poetry, the title is usually first, oddly enough.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 04:58 pm (UTC)I don't write poetry but I wonder if this is because in a poem you have your theme more firmly set in your mind than in a story? That is, a poem is generally a more tight encapsulation of a single theme than a story is, so sometimes a story can take turns you don't expect, modifying the theme, I don't know if you title things for that reason, based on theme - I do - but if so, that might make sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-06 08:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-06 08:23 pm (UTC)