![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I would take this a step further. For the last few years I've been really noticing that this even extends to commercials. You almost always see a geeky, slightly overweight guy with a fairly attractive, thin woman. In nearly every commercial. Not so attractive that they're scary, just pretty in a generic way.
I can't remember the last time I saw a commercial featuring a married couple who were both on the plus side, or with an attractive man and a not-quite-as-attractive woman. Yeah, I'm sure y'all will pull exceptions out of your hats, but still, they're the exceptions, not the rules. In most commercials with goofy-looking guys, the wife is nearly a knockout.
I do remember that I nearly jumped out of my skin when I saw a KIA commercial with actors/actresses who appeared to represent the populace more realistically. That was a campaign from about two or three years ago. Even better, it had some sort of punchline involving one of the heavier woman actually (gasp!) having relations with a guy. (Even though you'd never know it from watching TV, plus-size people actually do fall in love, have sex, and do all of the things thin people do.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:36 pm (UTC)Here's a story about sitcom idiot husbands and supermodel wives: http://www.slate.com/id/2111762/
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:42 pm (UTC)This is a point of constant irritation with the lesbians I hang out with. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:52 pm (UTC)I am at least amused by the Doritos ad that ran for the Stuporbowl and is now on tv in regular ad circulation. The woman at the check out counter flirting with the guy with the mutton chop facial hair buying bags of chips. They are both overweight and clearly flirting and into both one another and chips in a twist on food lust. You know the one?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:50 pm (UTC)Oh yeah, don't even get me started on how this generation of TV husbands seems to be spelling out a fantasy of reverting back to babyhood.
You know the one?
Hmm. Nope, haven't seen that one. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 07:59 pm (UTC)If this is true, it says something rather frightening about our society. Girls are raised to think that being pretty is more important than being smart, and boys are raised to distrust girls who are smarter than they are. (Hence, the smart, geeky, but average-looking guy with a thin, pretty girl in the commercials.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:51 pm (UTC)Food for thought. Thanks!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 08:03 pm (UTC)~nods~ I wouldn't even been so offended if the men were presented as being intelligent, but it's usually some rude, arrogant, dim-witted jackass paired with smart, pretty (and yes, thin) wife.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 10:40 pm (UTC)We do!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 12:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-16 11:22 pm (UTC)I'd like to see more people of color, for example... and not in a token way. There's been some progress but I don't think anyone can kid themselves, it's not that great.
And I'd like to see more disabled people, in a way that this was not the focus of their character. Our culture's value judgments are trained by seeing only certain (very few) traits reflected back in the media... And that's really sad.
You're quite right there's another phenomenon of not putting women in TV shows or ads unless they're thin and conventionally beautiful. When I was young I loved Margaret Cho's sitcom. I was completely abashed to find out, years later, she was taken off the air for not being thin enough, and replaced with Drew Carey (!).
Not watching TV or looking at women's magazines anymore has greatly improved my inner calm! :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 12:49 am (UTC)Of course, I must say that I do maintain a rather elitist attitude about rude people who hang up on me...heh.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 01:52 am (UTC)P.S. I tried to reply to your comment the other day about h/c recs, but only to say that I didn't bookmark anything. But then my computer kept freezing up everytime I tried to reply. These kinds of technology problems are likely why I don't trust bookmarks in the first place... ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:12 am (UTC)Too late, I've already done so! ha!
Aw, it's too bad about the bookmarks. Let me know, though, if you remember any fave h/c authors' names. I'd love to hear them! :)
*hugs*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 12:52 am (UTC)Amen, sister.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 01:09 am (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O97h4_xlkJA
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 01:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:13 am (UTC)And no problem about the thread...I've done the same thing myself. heh.
I was thinking of you today...was working on the iPod and found your music in my iTunes program...I still love the Mary Stuart music, it rocks.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 01:39 am (UTC)/rant
*Runs to put a cold cloth on back of neck*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:25 am (UTC)And I love that this perfect heavenly meal of togetherness involves KFC. The irony is complete.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 04:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 02:03 am (UTC)Carmen: sexy, voluptuous brunette, large-breasted, Latin beauty. Exotic.
Kelly: blond, pretty/beautiful, innocent face but a knockout body.
Julie: gorgeous red-head, athletic, but very feminine.
Jed: 25-30. Filmmaker. Unsure of his place in the world, great guy, but sometimes not confident. Funny. Still getting over a bad break-up. Easy-going, sometimes lazy, but has something to offer.
Send resumes to: Jeff Kalikowski, NYU
That is not an exaggeration. I've never forgotten the classic character description of "pretty/beautiful." Wow! You mean you would possibly settle for just pretty if the actress wasn't beautiful? Or is pretty/beautiful just meant to distinguish her from exotic/beautiful or gorgeous/beautiful?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 03:29 am (UTC)Recently I've been obsessed with the concept that there are some singer/songwriters who are talented, but will never make it in the music business in front of the camera because they're not attractive enough by society's modern standards. You have to hit the genetic lottery twice, I think (talent and beauty), which makes it amazing when someone does. The other option is having only the beauty side of the equation, and adding a great production team. But if you only have the talent, I think the cards are stacked against you.
heh...come in for one rant, have another while you're stopping by!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-03-17 04:43 pm (UTC)I was reading a book called Scriptwriting for Dummies once, and it said, basically, that if you were over 30 you could not write for television shows. (Unless you're legendary somehow, I guess.) And that makes me wonder how TV is impacted. There has to be some effect, after all; having all of those people with lower levels of life experience and perspective must do something, I'd say.
And it definitely seems like we see one adolescent fantasy after another. I miss Roseanne. At least the characters on her show had real problems, and looked real.